- High Output Work
- Posts
- ☄️ Stripe’s Scaling Secrets
This Week In AI
Fundraising/Acquisitions
Innovation
Rules & Regulations
Stripe’s Scaling Secrets
50% of the Fortune 100 run on Stripe.
Stripe processes $1.4 trillion annually with infrastructure that achieves 99.999% uptime.
That's 5.26 minutes of downtime per year versus the industry standard of 8.76 hours.
Here are the secrets that allowed Stripe to become a $91.5 billion company:
Solve the Hair-on-Fire Problem First
In 2010 integrating payments meant weeks of paperwork, complex APIs, and constant breakage.
Patrick and John Collison turned that into 7 lines of code.
The setup time went from weeks to one afternoon.
This eliminated the core friction that made developers hate payment processing.
But solving the hair-on-fire problem was just the beginning. Stripe needed systems to maintain that simplicity at massive scale, since their product was immediately able to serve so many businesses.
Build a Friction-Elimination Machine
Stripe created friction logging - a systematic process where employees document every user pain point.
Each log captures:
The specific context and user type
What worked vs what created confusion
Screenshots at the exact moment of friction
Stripe takes this seriously. Every new employee at the company is taught how to give feedback with friction logs.
These logs are accessible to anyone company-wide which creates a network effect, where every employee is making the system more effective.
This obsession with eliminating friction shaped their infrastructure decisions too.
Infrastructure as Strategy
When your product promise is simplicity and saved time, your infrastructure can't be the bottleneck.
Stripe built DocDB, their custom document database on MongoDB, which allowed them to have 99.9999% uptime.
For context: if your car had 99.9999% uptime, it would only break down for 30 seconds every 10 years of daily driving.
Why build a database vs buy an off-the-shelf option? When you're processing $1.4 trillion annually - more money than the entire GDP of Spain - you can't risk hitting someone else's scaling limits.
Off-the-shelf payment systems work fine a small scale. But imagine trying to run the NYSE on Excel. At some point, you need purpose-built infrastructure.
DocDB enables zero-downtime upgrades and elastic scaling. Like adding lanes to a highway while cars are driving 70mph. No closures. No slowdowns.
These strategic infrastructure investments compound, but even the systems also need the right people to build, evolve, and grow them.
Stripe’s Talent Strategy
Stripe needed A-players on the team to succeed.
Stripe’s approach to getting A-players was to offer truly meaningful equity for early hires.
As Patrick Collison puts it: "For our first 10 people at Stripe, we gave away more than 10% of the equity. Be extremely generous with your first employees and less so with your investors."
This is surprisingly contrarian advice. Even people who say they want to reward employees well typically don’t give away that much equity to them. It’s a bold but smart idea to align the incentives of the most important people building your vision.
Another great point by Patrick on hiring is this: "The thing that I wish we were better calibrated on earlier is the idea that you should over-hire for slope and under-hire for y-intercept. Most of the time in your hiring process, you're trying to figure out where this person is right now. That's actually much less important, especially for the early hires, than the slope at which they grow and improve."
Bottom Line
Stripe proves that the right systems are what allow true scale:
Eliminate the user’s core friction first
Build processes that surface and fix problems that become part of your culture
Invest in infrastructure that scales 10x before you need it
Hire people who grow faster than your company
Until next week,
David Lobo
Head of Growth, Workmate
P.S. If you're building systems that scale, you'll appreciate this: Workmate is our AI executive assistant that handles scheduling so you can focus on higher-leverage work like the strategic decisions above.
What'd you think of this issue? |